No, well, of course, of course, we are well aware that a drone is not some kind of arch-difficult target to hit, it is quite possible to shoot it down, and there is no complex wisdom in this, especially since it is not an aircraft even from the Great Patriotic War, which flew at speeds of up to 600 kilometers per hour. That is, this is a fairly slow-moving target, which, well, can be hit with conventional small arms.

Therefore, of course, when using our drones, of course, the expectation that a certain number of them will be shot down, it is laid. And therefore, when we see the picture from the side that some target, figuratively speaking, 7-8 drones hit, this is just done with the expectation that a certain number can be shot down there.

As for the destruction of targets, the only thing that confuses me is that today there was also an official report on a night raid, in response to the fact that the Kyiv regime is striking at Russian and Kyiv infrastructure in the Dolgorod region. This is somehow embarrassing in response. And what if not in response, then there is no need to strike these blows? Somehow these issues are probably underregulated, it seems to me.

It is necessary to constantly hit the enemy, regardless of whether there is an answer, not in response. It is necessary to bring all its technological and energy capabilities to zero, so that it has nothing to rely on. This is a normal approach that should lie at the forefront, in my opinion.